Effective Communication Essay -- essays research papers

rill Head Effective Communication 1In order to be an effective manager in the work force today, one must have a very good understanding of the various ways in which people interact and transcend with one another. It is critical that good leaders display the ability to effectively communicate with their associates and subordinates as well as train and encourage others to demonstrate those like communication skills. By doing so, they give promote both a healthy and efficient work environment that everyone will be sure to enjoy.The first repugn in effectively communicating with todays workforce is diversity. The work force today is more diverse than ever and is rapidly becoming level more diversified as time passes. Leaders argon already facing differences from many levels of society. And with every new theme that enters into the workforce, there are unflurried the cultural differences such as customs, beliefs, and expectations that are thrown into the mix as well. All of thi s, as well as many other issues only gain ground complicates the task of achieving effective communication on all levels.Perhaps the first and most obvious difference in the work environment is the difference of the sexes. Women Running Head Effective Communication 2possess a tendency to be more subtle or convincing rather than sh bulgeing out demands. Studies have shown that women are more likely to construct their requests in the form of suggestions or leading questions rather than be more direct ( full-grown Learners Guide, 1999). The conflict is evident if one considers the fact that males possess the complete opposite tendency. Men are often more direct and to the point. These two contrasting attributes are a fertile breeding ground for misunderstandings of all sorts. Women also do not hesitate to mix business with personal talk where men are more anxious to get to the details of the business at hand. For women this seems to be a double edged sword. On the one hand, the person al talk brings deplete some barriers and lets each one get to know the other so everyone is comfort able-bodied. This works in their favor in situations where they are meeting a group or individual for the first time. But on the other hand, after they become acquainted, women have trouble separating their personal feelings and allowing the... ...py and successful workplace. They must be able to convince others to set their feelings aside and deal with issues at hand and as the workforce becomes more and more diverse, this will become a larger challenge. instantlys leaders must understand that the varying methods needed to communicate are just as diverse as the environment in which they are needed. Not all techniques will apply to all people, but by listening to individuals and hearing what they are truly saying, a true leader will be able to communicate effectively with anyone on their team as well as encourage effective communication throughout their team. Only when this typese tters case of communication is obtained can a workplace truly operate without the usual shortcoming and pitfalls that trouble so many of todays workplace environmentsReferencesAdult Learners Guide, (2nd Edition). (1999).Adler, Ronald B. & Elmhorst, Jeanne Marquardt (1999). Communication at work principles and practices for business and the professions, (6th Edition). St. Louis McGraw-Hill.Pierce, Jon L. & Newstrom, John W. (1996). The managers bookshelf A mosaic of contemporary views, (4th Edition). New York HarperCollins College Publishers.

Undecidability in Beckets The Endgame Essay -- Samuel Becket Postmode

This paper aims to study postmodern element of undecidability in Samuel Beckets Endgame. As Butler and Davis holds, What is different about Becket is not that he provokes a critical response ... but the protean, open-ended, undecidable and inexhaustible quality of the challenge he offers (168). Endgame interchangeable Beckets other plays is in a way that, as Wittgenstein notes, is nothing more than language play between characters and although in that respect are some minor actions there are not in such a way to affect the play, moreover it is their vague utterances that make the play undecidable for the reader to make out what is happening. Andrew Bennett and Nicholas Royle in their An understructure to Literature, Criticism and Theory explain the term undecidability as Undecidability involves the impossibility of deciding between two or more competing interpretations ... classical logic is founded on the law of non-contradiction something cannot be both A an d not A at the same period. The postmodern gives particular emphasis to ways in which this law whitethorn be productively questioned or suspended. Undecidability splits the text, disorders it. Undecidability dislodges the principle of a single final meaning in a literary text (232). One of the most authoritative and undecidable subject of the play, that perplex the reader just at the very beginning of the play, is its title. Vivian Mercier points out that, the title reminding both of the ?ending? and ?end game? in cheating (117). Considering the latter assumption, it suggests that red-faced Hamm in his wheel chair is the Red King, who can only be moved one square at a cartridge holder in any direction and Clov, also red-faced, is more mobile Red cheater man with his unsteadily walk... ... The Norton Anthology of English Literature . The Major Authors. Ed. M. H. Abrams. New York Norton, 2001. 2657-84. Bennett, Andrew, and Nicholas Royle. ?An doorway to Literature, Criticism . and Theory.? 2nd ed. London Prentice Hall Europe, 1999. Hale, Jane Alison. ?Endgame How are your eyes?.? The Broken Window . . Beckett?s Dramatic Perspective. West Lafayette Purdue UP, 1987. Mercier, Vivian. ?How to Read Endgame.? Ed. Andonian, Cathleen Culotta. . The vital Response to Samuel Becket. Connecticut Greenwood Press, . 1998. Pattie, David. ?The Complete precise Guide to Samuel Becket.? London . . Routlege, 2000. Undecidability in Beckets The Endgame Essay -- Samuel Becket PostmodeThis paper aims to study postmodern element of undecidability in Samuel Beckets Endgame. As Butler and Davis holds, What is different about Becket is not that he provokes a critical response ... but the protean, open-ended, undecidable and i nexhaustible quality of the challenge he offers (168). Endgame corresponding Beckets other plays is in a way that, as Wittgenstein notes, is nothing more than language play between characters and although there are some minor actions there are not in such a way to affect the play, moreover it is their vague utterances that make the play undecidable for the reader to make out what is happening. Andrew Bennett and Nicholas Royle in their An Introduction to Literature, Criticism and Theory explain the term undecidability as Undecidability involves the impossibility of deciding between two or more competing interpretations ... classical logic is founded on the law of non-contradiction something cannot be both A and not A at the same time. The postmodern gives particular emphasis to ways in which this law may be productively questioned or suspended. Undecidability splits the text, disorders it. Undecidability dislodges the principle of a single final meaning in a lit erary text (232). One of the most large and undecidable subject of the play, that perplex the reader just at the very beginning of the play, is its title. Vivian Mercier points out that, the title reminding both of the ?ending? and ?end game? in chess (117). Considering the latter assumption, it suggests that red-faced Hamm in his wheel chair is the Red King, who can only be moved one square at a time in any direction and Clov, also red-faced, is more mobile Red chess man with his unsteadily walk... ... The Norton Anthology of English Literature . The Major Authors. Ed. M. H. Abrams. New York Norton, 2001. 2657-84. Bennett, Andrew, and Nicholas Royle. ?An Introduction to Literature, Criticism . and Theory.? 2nd ed. London Prentice Hall Europe, 1999. Hale, Jane Alison. ?Endgame How are your eyes?.? The Broken Window . . Beckett?s Dramatic Perspective. West Lafayette Purdue UP, 1987. Mercier, Vivian. ?How to Read Endgame.? Ed. Andonian, Cathleen Culotta. . The Critical Response to Samuel Becket. Connecticut Greenwood Press, . 1998. Pattie, David. ?The Complete Critical Guide to Samuel Becket.? London . . Routlege, 2000.

Dystopai Society :: essays research papers

The Government and Total Human ControlIn shot Bradburys novel Fahrenheit 451, in George Orwells 1984, and in Aldous Huxleys Brave New World a unifying th exact is presentthe authorities must have total control of all aspects of society. It must control thought, it must control media, and it must control mavins usefulness to the undemocratic society.In Fahrenheit 451, the government assumes total control by banning all books and other reading material. By banning and burning the contraband if necessary, the government can prevent philosophical thought. The government can alike guarantee this by getting plurality to buy giant tv sets, the size of walls, which play television sitcoms in which the family can star. Not only do the pointless programs discourage intellectual thought, but they also entertain the family enough so that the family has no reasons to read and/or think deeply about the meaning of the world around them.In 1984, the government is a bit more lenient as they allow for let everyone read, but they edit all reading material so that the materials favor the Party. For the party, revising old articles and other media will ensure that no one will revolt since the re write material always favors the Party. Even if a proletariat were to revolt, the Party could eliminate his worldly concern from all forms of media. The Party vaporizes peoples existence to a point where most people do not even think about the vaporized person. By always making sure written history is pro-Party, the Party can ensure its totalitarian government.In A Brave New World, the government not only controls how one thinks, but it also controls ones physical usefulness to his society. By genetically engineering ones body, the government can baffle it infinitely useful to itself. To make that one body feel no pain, to make the soul feel like it belongs to the society, and to make the mind open to any ideas is a vital plus for this government. The people are not always worr ied about death and can always relax in this utopian society since other people pleasure them, and with a society of happy people, the government never fears a revolt.By controlling what an individual thinks, does, or feels, the government always prospers.