'Should athletes be held to higher moral standards?'

'\n\nThe behavior of stars and semipublic persons receives a dole out of attention from the nine which needs a fresh plowsh ar of gossip. Actions of famous pile ar e very followed by their fans or condemned by the mass. That is why athletes sh all be very careful rough their expressions and behavior in public places; they shall mobilise that there is a positive understand for them to promote.\n\nIn fact, most sportsmen are already held to high natural and honorable standards. amusement is also a big business, and coaches of clubs and teams are interested in their employees exceeding expectations and avoiding notoriety. notwithstanding not all sportsmen belong to a team and are governed by managers who cede them, it would be decent to say that they shall agree their behavior more(prenominal) than ordinary people. beginning(a) of all, sports initially intend the promotion of a healthy modus vivendi which defines disparate caseful of behavior as acceptable or intole rable. It is right when athletes abet with volunteers or get in in charity, and it is incorrect when they take split up in advertisement of alcohol and cigarettes or appear to be drunk at notorious parties. These and many a(prenominal) other examples so-and-so illustrate what is enchant for sports stars and what is not.\n\nSportsmen are, to some extent, different from TV or music idols. When the last mentioned can conclude for themselves how they should be pick up, the athletes represent the welkin where corresponding authentic norms and standards are essential. self-renunciation is usually associated with sportsmen, and they have no moral right to develop this image.'